Adobe Firefly vs AUTOMATIC1111
Adobe Firefly and AUTOMATIC1111 are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Adobe Firefly | AUTOMATIC1111 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Adobe | AUTOMATIC1111 |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.7 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop | Desktop, Self-host |
| Key features | Generative fill, Text effects, Image expansion | The original SD WebUI, Extensions and LoRA ecosystem, Every sampler and slider |
| Headquarters | San Jose, USA | Open source |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- AUTOMATIC1111 has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★).
- Adobe Firefly is Freemium, while AUTOMATIC1111 is Free.
- AUTOMATIC1111 is open source (its code is public), while Adobe Firefly is proprietary.
- Adobe Firefly runs on Web, Desktop; AUTOMATIC1111 runs on Desktop, Self-host.
Frequently asked questions
Is Adobe Firefly or AUTOMATIC1111 better?
By user rating, AUTOMATIC1111 scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Adobe Firefly or AUTOMATIC1111?
Adobe Firefly is Freemium and AUTOMATIC1111 is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Adobe Firefly and AUTOMATIC1111 open source?
AUTOMATIC1111 is open source, while Adobe Firefly is proprietary.