AUTOMATIC1111 vs FLUX 1.1 Pro
AUTOMATIC1111 and FLUX 1.1 Pro are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | AUTOMATIC1111 | FLUX 1.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | AUTOMATIC1111 | Black Forest Labs |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop, Self-host | Web, API |
| Key features | The original SD WebUI, Extensions and LoRA ecosystem, Every sampler and slider | 6x faster than FLUX Pro, Improved prompt adherence, Higher output diversity |
| Headquarters | Open source | Freiburg, Germany |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Key differences
- AUTOMATIC1111 has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★).
- AUTOMATIC1111 is Free, while FLUX 1.1 Pro is Paid.
- AUTOMATIC1111 is open source (its code is public), while FLUX 1.1 Pro is proprietary.
- AUTOMATIC1111 runs on Desktop, Self-host; FLUX 1.1 Pro runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is AUTOMATIC1111 or FLUX 1.1 Pro better?
By user rating, AUTOMATIC1111 scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, AUTOMATIC1111 or FLUX 1.1 Pro?
AUTOMATIC1111 is Free and FLUX 1.1 Pro is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are AUTOMATIC1111 and FLUX 1.1 Pro open source?
AUTOMATIC1111 is open source, while FLUX 1.1 Pro is proprietary.