Skip to index

AUTOMATIC1111 vs Fooocus

AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeAUTOMATIC1111Fooocus
VendorAUTOMATIC1111lllyasviel
Rating★ 4.7★ 4.7
PricingFreeFree
PlatformsDesktop, Self-hostDesktop, Self-host
Key featuresThe original SD WebUI, Extensions and LoRA ecosystem, Every sampler and sliderMidjourney-like prompt box on SD, Off-screen / optimized sampling, Minimal sliders, strong defaults
HeadquartersOpen sourceOpen source
Founded20222023
Open sourceYesYes

Key differences

  • AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus share the same user rating (4.7★).
  • Both AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus use a Free model.
  • Both AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus are open source.
  • AUTOMATIC1111 runs on Desktop, Self-host; Fooocus runs on Desktop, Self-host.

Frequently asked questions

Is AUTOMATIC1111 or Fooocus better?

AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus are rated equally (4.7★) by users, so the better choice depends on your needs — see the feature and platform comparison above.

Which is cheaper, AUTOMATIC1111 or Fooocus?

Both AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus use a Free pricing model.

Are AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus open source?

Yes — both AUTOMATIC1111 and Fooocus are open source.

More Image Generation comparisons