AUTOMATIC1111 vs Kandinsky
AUTOMATIC1111 and Kandinsky are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | AUTOMATIC1111 | Kandinsky |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | AUTOMATIC1111 | Sber AI |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4 |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop, Self-host | Web, API |
| Key features | The original SD WebUI, Extensions and LoRA ecosystem, Every sampler and slider | Multilingual prompt understanding, Open model weights, Style presets |
| Headquarters | Open source | Moscow, Russia |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Key differences
- AUTOMATIC1111 has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4★).
- AUTOMATIC1111 is Free, while Kandinsky is Freemium.
- AUTOMATIC1111 is open source (its code is public), while Kandinsky is proprietary.
- AUTOMATIC1111 runs on Desktop, Self-host; Kandinsky runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is AUTOMATIC1111 or Kandinsky better?
By user rating, AUTOMATIC1111 scores higher (4.7★ vs 4★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, AUTOMATIC1111 or Kandinsky?
AUTOMATIC1111 is Free and Kandinsky is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are AUTOMATIC1111 and Kandinsky open source?
AUTOMATIC1111 is open source, while Kandinsky is proprietary.