Skip to index

AUTOMATIC1111 vs Topaz Labs

AUTOMATIC1111 and Topaz Labs are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeAUTOMATIC1111Topaz Labs
VendorAUTOMATIC1111Topaz Labs
Rating★ 4.7★ 4.6
PricingFreePaid
PlatformsDesktop, Self-hostWindows, macOS
Key featuresThe original SD WebUI, Extensions and LoRA ecosystem, Every sampler and sliderPhoto AI: upscale, denoise, sharpen, Video AI: frame interpolation & stabilization, Face recovery tuned for realism
HeadquartersOpen sourceDallas, USA
Founded20222005
Open sourceYesNo

Key differences

  • AUTOMATIC1111 has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★).
  • AUTOMATIC1111 is Free, while Topaz Labs is Paid.
  • AUTOMATIC1111 is open source (its code is public), while Topaz Labs is proprietary.
  • AUTOMATIC1111 runs on Desktop, Self-host; Topaz Labs runs on Windows, macOS.

Frequently asked questions

Is AUTOMATIC1111 or Topaz Labs better?

By user rating, AUTOMATIC1111 scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, AUTOMATIC1111 or Topaz Labs?

AUTOMATIC1111 is Free and Topaz Labs is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.

Are AUTOMATIC1111 and Topaz Labs open source?

AUTOMATIC1111 is open source, while Topaz Labs is proprietary.

More Image Generation comparisons