Cline vs Cursor
Cline and Cursor are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cline | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cline Bot | Cursor |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.8 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | VS Code | Desktop |
| Key features | Autonomous multi-file edits, Terminal command execution, BYOK multi-model support | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★).
- Both Cline and Cursor use a Freemium model.
- Cline is open source (its code is public), while Cursor is proprietary.
- Cline runs on VS Code; Cursor runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cline or Cursor better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.7★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cline or Cursor?
Both Cline and Cursor use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Cline and Cursor open source?
Cline is open source, while Cursor is proprietary.