Cursor 2.0 vs Cursor Background Agents
Cursor 2.0 and Cursor Background Agents are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | Cursor Background Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | Web, IDE |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 and Cursor Background Agents share the same user rating (4.6★).
- Both Cursor 2.0 and Cursor Background Agents use a Paid model.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or Cursor Background Agents better?
Cursor 2.0 and Cursor Background Agents are rated equally (4.6★) by users, so the better choice depends on your needs — see the feature and platform comparison above.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or Cursor Background Agents?
Both Cursor 2.0 and Cursor Background Agents use a Paid pricing model.
Are Cursor 2.0 and Cursor Background Agents open source?
No — neither Cursor 2.0 nor Cursor Background Agents is open source.