Cursor vs Cursor 2.0
Cursor and Cursor 2.0 are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor | Cursor 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cursor | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.8 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | Desktop |
| Key features | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★).
- Cursor is Freemium, while Cursor 2.0 is Paid.
- Cursor runs on Desktop; Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor or Cursor 2.0 better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor or Cursor 2.0?
Cursor is Freemium and Cursor 2.0 is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor and Cursor 2.0 open source?
No — neither Cursor nor Cursor 2.0 is open source.