Cursor vs Cursor Background Agents
Cursor and Cursor Background Agents are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor | Cursor Background Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cursor | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.8 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | Web, IDE |
| Key features | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★).
- Cursor is Freemium, while Cursor Background Agents is Paid.
- Cursor runs on Desktop; Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor or Cursor Background Agents better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor or Cursor Background Agents?
Cursor is Freemium and Cursor Background Agents is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor and Cursor Background Agents open source?
No — neither Cursor nor Cursor Background Agents is open source.