Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor and GitHub Copilot are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cursor | GitHub |
| Rating | ★ 4.8 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim |
| Key features | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion | Code completion, Code generation, Chat |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★).
- Cursor is Freemium, while GitHub Copilot is Paid.
- Cursor runs on Desktop; GitHub Copilot runs on VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor or GitHub Copilot better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor is Freemium and GitHub Copilot is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor and GitHub Copilot open source?
No — neither Cursor nor GitHub Copilot is open source.