FLUX 1.1 Pro vs Kandinsky
FLUX 1.1 Pro and Kandinsky are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | FLUX 1.1 Pro | Kandinsky |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Black Forest Labs | Sber AI |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Key features | 6x faster than FLUX Pro, Improved prompt adherence, Higher output diversity | Multilingual prompt understanding, Open model weights, Style presets |
| Headquarters | Freiburg, Germany | Moscow, Russia |
| Founded | 2024 | 2022 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- FLUX 1.1 Pro has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4★).
- FLUX 1.1 Pro is Paid, while Kandinsky is Freemium.
- FLUX 1.1 Pro runs on Web, API; Kandinsky runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is FLUX 1.1 Pro or Kandinsky better?
By user rating, FLUX 1.1 Pro scores higher (4.5★ vs 4★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, FLUX 1.1 Pro or Kandinsky?
FLUX 1.1 Pro is Paid and Kandinsky is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are FLUX 1.1 Pro and Kandinsky open source?
No — neither FLUX 1.1 Pro nor Kandinsky is open source.