Skip to index

Hunyuan3D vs Sloyd

Hunyuan3D and Sloyd are both 3D Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeHunyuan3DSloyd
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorTencentSloyd
Rating★ 4.3★ 4.1
PricingFreemiumFreemium
PlatformsSelf-hostWeb
Key featuresImage-to-shape generation in 2.0, Separate texture-generation stage, Published inference code and weightsText/image-to-3D generation, Parametric template editor, Plan-dependent exports and plugins
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceNoNo

Key differences

  • Hunyuan3D carries the higher editorial score (4.3★ vs 4.1★).
  • Both Hunyuan3D and Sloyd use a Freemium model.
  • Hunyuan3D runs on Self-host; Sloyd runs on Web.

Hunyuan3D and Sloyd at a glance

Hunyuan3D

Tencent

Tencent's 3D model family; the documented 2.0 release provides image-conditioned shape and texture generation under a restricted community license.

Rating
4.3★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Read the exact 2.0 territory, user-scale and training restrictions before downloading; inspect mesh suitability separately.

Strengths

  • Published 2.0 inference and model documentation
  • Shape and texture stages can be considered separately

Key features

  • Image-to-shape generation in 2.0
  • Separate texture-generation stage
  • Published inference code and weights
  • Local demo and Blender integration

Best for

  • Permitted-territory mesh-generation evaluation
  • Texture experiments on authorized meshes
Read the full Hunyuan3D review →

Sloyd

Sloyd

Browser 3D generation from text, images and editable templates, with plan-specific exports and licenses.

Rating
4.1★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Select the workflow and license before budgeting credits or distributing exported models.

Strengths

  • Generation and editable templates are both available
  • Published tiers distinguish exports and commercial rights

Key features

  • Text/image-to-3D generation
  • Parametric template editor
  • Plan-dependent exports and plugins

Best for

  • Reviewing object concepts and template variations
  • Preparing licensed assets with manual topology/export checks
Read the full Sloyd review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Hunyuan3D also lists: Image-to-shape generation in 2.0, Separate texture-generation stage, Published inference code and weights, Local demo and Blender integration
  • Sloyd also lists: Text/image-to-3D generation, Parametric template editor, Plan-dependent exports and plugins

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan3D or Sloyd better?

By editorial score, Hunyuan3D scores higher (4.3★ vs 4.1★). Both are capable 3D Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Hunyuan3D or Sloyd?

Both Hunyuan3D and Sloyd use a Freemium pricing model.

Are Hunyuan3D and Sloyd open source?

No — neither Hunyuan3D nor Sloyd is open source.

What platforms do Hunyuan3D and Sloyd support?

Hunyuan3D supports Self-host; Sloyd supports Web.

What are the main features of Hunyuan3D and Sloyd?

Hunyuan3D: Image-to-shape generation in 2.0, Separate texture-generation stage, Published inference code and weights, Local demo and Blender integration. Sloyd: Text/image-to-3D generation, Parametric template editor, Plan-dependent exports and plugins.

Visit Hunyuan3D →Visit Sloyd →

More 3D Generation comparisons

Cascadeur vs DeepMotionCascadeur vs Hunyuan3DCascadeur vs KaedimCascadeur vs Luma 3D CaptureCascadeur vs MeshyCascadeur vs Mixamo