Invoke vs Kandinsky
Invoke and Kandinsky are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Invoke | Kandinsky |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Invoke | Sber AI |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web, Self-host | Web, API |
| Key features | Node-based SD workflows, Unified canvas for inpaint and outpaint, ControlNet / IP-Adapter craft tools | Multilingual prompt understanding, Open model weights, Style presets |
| Headquarters | Atlanta, USA | Moscow, Russia |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Key differences
- Invoke has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4★).
- Both Invoke and Kandinsky use a Freemium model.
- Invoke is open source (its code is public), while Kandinsky is proprietary.
- Invoke runs on Desktop, Web, Self-host; Kandinsky runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is Invoke or Kandinsky better?
By user rating, Invoke scores higher (4.6★ vs 4★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Invoke or Kandinsky?
Both Invoke and Kandinsky use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Invoke and Kandinsky open source?
Invoke is open source, while Kandinsky is proprietary.