Skip to index

Luma 3D Capture vs Sloyd

Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd are both 3D Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeLuma 3D CaptureSloyd
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorLuma AISloyd
Rating★ 4.3★ 4.1
PricingFreemiumFreemium
PlatformsiOS, WebWeb
Key featuresiPhone 3D capture, Mesh and splat exports, WebGL/Three.js scene integrationText/image-to-3D generation, Parametric template editor, Plan-dependent exports and plugins
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceNoNo

Key differences

  • Luma 3D Capture carries the higher editorial score (4.3★ vs 4.1★).
  • Both Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd use a Freemium model.
  • Luma 3D Capture runs on iOS, Web; Sloyd runs on Web.

Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd at a glance

Luma 3D Capture

Luma AI

iPhone scene capture with mesh, NeRF and Gaussian-splat exports and documented WebGL viewing.

Rating
4.3★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Evaluate the specific Capture workflow and its applicable rights; a Luma video plan does not establish Capture pricing or access.

Strengths

  • Capture and export paths documented by the app developer
  • Official examples for integrating existing captures into WebGL

Key features

  • iPhone 3D capture
  • Mesh and splat exports
  • WebGL/Three.js scene integration

Best for

  • Reviewing permitted object/scene captures
  • Embedding existing capture artifacts in a reviewed web viewer
Read the full Luma 3D Capture review →

Sloyd

Sloyd

Browser 3D generation from text, images and editable templates, with plan-specific exports and licenses.

Rating
4.1★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Select the workflow and license before budgeting credits or distributing exported models.

Strengths

  • Generation and editable templates are both available
  • Published tiers distinguish exports and commercial rights

Key features

  • Text/image-to-3D generation
  • Parametric template editor
  • Plan-dependent exports and plugins

Best for

  • Reviewing object concepts and template variations
  • Preparing licensed assets with manual topology/export checks
Read the full Sloyd review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Luma 3D Capture also lists: iPhone 3D capture, Mesh and splat exports, WebGL/Three.js scene integration
  • Sloyd also lists: Text/image-to-3D generation, Parametric template editor, Plan-dependent exports and plugins

Frequently asked questions

Is Luma 3D Capture or Sloyd better?

By editorial score, Luma 3D Capture scores higher (4.3★ vs 4.1★). Both are capable 3D Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Luma 3D Capture or Sloyd?

Both Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd use a Freemium pricing model.

Are Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd open source?

No — neither Luma 3D Capture nor Sloyd is open source.

What platforms do Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd support?

Luma 3D Capture supports iOS, Web; Sloyd supports Web.

What are the main features of Luma 3D Capture and Sloyd?

Luma 3D Capture: iPhone 3D capture, Mesh and splat exports, WebGL/Three.js scene integration. Sloyd: Text/image-to-3D generation, Parametric template editor, Plan-dependent exports and plugins.

Visit Luma 3D Capture →Visit Sloyd →

More 3D Generation comparisons

Cascadeur vs DeepMotionCascadeur vs Hunyuan3DCascadeur vs KaedimCascadeur vs Luma 3D CaptureCascadeur vs MeshyCascadeur vs Mixamo