Notta vs Ulysses
Notta and Ulysses are both Productivity tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Notta | Ulysses |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Notta | Ulysses GmbH & Co. KG |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Extension | macOS, iOS |
| Key features | Live transcription for meetings & audio, Translation across 104 languages, AI summaries & action items | Sheet library, Writing goals, Export |
| Headquarters | Tokyo, Japan | Hamburg, Germany |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Ulysses has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★).
- Notta is Freemium, while Ulysses is Paid.
- Notta runs on Web, iOS, Android, Extension; Ulysses runs on macOS, iOS.
Frequently asked questions
Is Notta or Ulysses better?
By user rating, Ulysses scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Productivity tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Notta or Ulysses?
Notta is Freemium and Ulysses is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Notta and Ulysses open source?
No — neither Notta nor Ulysses is open source.