Skip to index

Cursor Bugbot

Product status: Status not recorded

No lifecycle review is recorded for this listing. Its inclusion in the directory does not confirm current availability; check the vendor before relying on it.

No status check date recorded

Cursor service for reviewing pull-request diffs and comments, with optional Cloud Agent Autofix. No lifecycle review is recorded for this listing. Its inclusion in the directory does not confirm current availability; check the vendor before relying on it.

Product preview

cursor.com
Preview of Cursor Bugbot

Decision notes

Official-document research

Based on the cited documentation. We did not use the product, purchase a plan, or run quality, speed or reliability tests in this review.

Consider it for

  • Teams able to configure repository access and branch checks

Choose another approach if

  • Proof that code is bug-free
  • Legacy per-seat pricing assumed to be today's offer

Pricing and conditions

Documented terms

Current X Premium is listed $30/month and includes Bugbot access; Plus at $8 excludes it. Bugbot uses usage-based access, with legacy seats separate. Third-party models and Autofix Cloud Agents can add charges; taxes/fees are excluded. Exact per-review cost, ISO currency, regional eligibility and account migration are unconfirmed.

Pricing source read:

Pricing or terms source

Code, model and service licensing

This is a hosted service, not a grant of Cursor source rights. Customer content processing is allowed for service/legal/safety purposes; explicit consent, flagged safety material and submitted feedback have distinct training rules, so no blanket zero-retention or no-training claim is justified. MSA/organization terms can take precedence. Output assignment does not clear third-party code or input rights.

Basis and limits of the recorded score

Original 4.5/5 retained; the original scoring worksheet and hands-on evidence are unavailable. This documentation review did not re-score it.

Overview

Bugbot reviews pull-request changes and comments through supported code hosts. A successful check means no unresolved finding, not proof that a change has no bugs. Findings are neutral by default, so requiring the check alone does not necessarily block merging.

Autofix is off by default and starts a separate Cloud Agent that may push a fix or open a PR depending on the host. It needs storage-enabled mode, usage credit and separate Cloud Agent billing. Review permissions, branch rules and sensitive repository data before enabling it.

Sources

The factual claims in this review were read from the pages below. Each date is when an editor last opened the source, not when the product changed.

Pros / Cons

Pros

  • Review attached to the PR workflow
  • Optional separate fix workflow

Cons

  • Findings need human review
  • Autofix changes data and cost requirements

Who it's for

01

A second review pass on changes

02

Controlled review/fix workflows

Bottom line

Budget for current usage and Autofix separately; keep human approval for code changes.

Key Features

PR review
SCM integrations
Optional Autofix
Usage-based access

Tags

Code reviewPull requestsCloud

Frequently asked questions

Is Cursor Bugbot currently available?

No lifecycle review is recorded for this listing. Its inclusion in the directory does not confirm current availability; check the vendor before relying on it.

What is Cursor Bugbot?

Cursor Bugbot is a Code Generation tool developed by Anysphere. Cursor service for reviewing pull-request diffs and comments, with optional Cloud Agent Autofix.

What costs and terms should I check for Cursor Bugbot?

Current X Premium is listed $30/month and includes Bugbot access; Plus at $8 excludes it. Bugbot uses usage-based access, with legacy seats separate. Third-party models and Autofix Cloud Agents can add charges; taxes/fees are excluded. Exact per-review cost, ISO currency, regional eligibility and account migration are unconfirmed.

Is Cursor Bugbot open source?

This is a hosted service, not a grant of Cursor source rights. Customer content processing is allowed for service/legal/safety purposes; explicit consent, flagged safety material and submitted feedback have distinct training rules, so no blanket zero-retention or no-training claim is justified. MSA/organization terms can take precedence. Output assignment does not clear third-party code or input rights.

What are the best alternatives to Cursor Bugbot?

Notable Code Generation alternatives include GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Replit Agent. Browse all 76 tools in our Code Generation category for a full overview.

Was this listing useful?

Visit official website →

Basic Info

Pricing
Paid

Current X Premium is listed $30/month and includes Bugbot access; Plus at $8 excludes it. Bugbot uses usage-based access, with legacy seats separate. Third-party models and Autofix Cloud Agents can add charges; taxes/fees are excluded. Exact per-review cost, ISO currency, regional eligibility and account migration are unconfirmed.

Editorial score
★ 4.5 / 5 How we score
Platforms
GitHubWeb
Last verified
Not recorded