Greptile

Product status: Status not recorded

No lifecycle review is recorded for this listing. Its inclusion in the directory does not confirm current availability; check the vendor before relying on it.

No status check date recorded

AI code review with repository-graph context, configurable rules and review tiers; cloud and commercially licensed self-hosted deployments have different data and operating requirements. No lifecycle review is recorded for this listing. Its inclusion in the directory does not confirm current availability; check the vendor before relying on it.

Product preview

Decision notes

Official-document research

Based on the cited documentation. We did not use the product, purchase a plan, or run quality, speed or reliability tests in this review.

Consider it for

Teams able to govern repository access and review suggestions

Choose another approach if

Unreviewed automatic merge decisions
Assumptions that self-hosting is free and fully offline

Pricing and conditions

Documented terms

Starter is free for one active developer with 50 credits/month. Pro displays $30/seat/month including 50 credits per seat; extra credits are $1 each. Base/Plus/Apex reviews consume 1/3/10 credits. Enterprise and licensed self-hosting require a quote. These are the page's dollar-sign amounts; ISO currency, taxes, regional checkout and annual terms were not separately confirmed. The 14-day trial is temporary; OSS and startup discounts have eligibility conditions and are not the standard price.

Pricing source read: 2026-10-15

Pricing or terms source

Code, model and service licensing

The service terms grant limited internal-use access; self-hosting needs a commercial license and image access, not an open-source grant. Cloud code is cached and embeddings stored. The security policy allows aggregate de-identified data for AI training with an account opt-out; self-hosted training collection is not enabled unless configured. Review the order, DPA, model-provider routing and deletion rules rather than assuming no training or no retention.

Basis and limits of the recorded score

The previous 4.6/5 is retained without recalculation. No original worksheet or reproduced review benchmark was established; the score is not validated by vendor claims.

Overview

Greptile reviews code changes using a graph of repository functions, classes and dependencies, according to its documentation. It provides PR findings, suggested fixes, configurable rules and review tiers. These mechanisms can help organize a human review, but do not establish complete codebase understanding, defect recall or a measured advantage over another reviewer.

Evaluate it against representative changes and the permissions needed to index your repositories. Cloud hosting caches code and stores embeddings; self-hosting requires a commercial license, infrastructure and configured model providers. Choosing self-hosting alone does not prove every inference request stays local. Account training preferences matter because the vendor allows de-identified data for AI training with an opt-out. This review connected no repository and measured neither review speed nor false positives.

Sources

The factual claims in this review were read from the pages below. Each date is when an editor last opened the source, not when the product changed.

Vendor documentation Checked 2026-10-15
Vendor documentation Checked 2026-10-15
Vendor documentation Checked 2026-10-15
Vendor pricing page Checked 2026-10-15
Vendor documentation Checked 2026-10-15
Vendor documentation Checked 2026-10-15

Pros / Cons

Pros

Cross-file context and configurable standards are documented
Cloud and licensed deployment paths are described

Cons

Findings still need human validation
Review tiers consume different credits
Cloud storage, training preferences and inference routing need review

Who it's for

Triage of PR review findings

Applying repository-specific review rules

Bottom line

Evaluate review usefulness and credit cost on your own changes; a repository graph or self-hosted deployment does not guarantee complete findings or local-only inference.

Key Features

Repository-graph review context

PR findings and suggested fixes

Configurable repository standards

Cloud or licensed self-hosting

Compare Greptile with alternatives

Greptile vs Cursor Greptile vs Claude Code Greptile vs Cline 76 products · Code Generation

Frequently asked questions

Is Greptile currently available?

No lifecycle review is recorded for this listing. Its inclusion in the directory does not confirm current availability; check the vendor before relying on it.

What is Greptile?

Greptile is a Code Generation tool developed by Greptile. AI code review with repository-graph context, configurable rules and review tiers; cloud and commercially licensed self-hosted deployments have different data and operating requirements.

What costs and terms should I check for Greptile?

Is Greptile open source?

What are the best alternatives to Greptile?

Notable Code Generation alternatives include GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Replit Agent. Browse all 76 tools in our Code Generation category for a full overview.

Was this listing useful?

Visit official website →

Basic Info

Pricing: Freemium
Starter is free for one active developer with 50 credits/month. Pro displays $30/seat/month including 50 credits per seat; extra credits are $1 each. Base/Plus/Apex reviews consume 1/3/10 credits. Enterprise and licensed self-hosting require a quote. These are the page's dollar-sign amounts; ISO currency, taxes, regional checkout and annual terms were not separately confirmed. The 14-day trial is temporary; OSS and startup discounts have eligibility conditions and are not the standard price.
Editorial score: ★ 4.6 / 5 How we score
Platforms: GitHubGitLabCode providersCLI
Last verified: Not recorded

Related Products

Compare with GitHub Copilot on the board