Skip to index

Agno vs Promptfoo

Agno and Promptfoo are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeAgnoPromptfoo
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorAgno Inc.Promptfoo
Rating★ 4.6★ 4.6
PricingFreemiumFreemium
PlatformsLibrary, Cloud, Agent UICLI, Library, Cloud
Key featuresAgents, teams and workflows, REST and MCP serving, Configurable database stateConfiguration-based evaluations, Red-team probes, CI threshold checks
Headquarters—San Francisco, USA
Launched——
Open sourceYesYes

Key differences

  • Agno and Promptfoo carry the same editorial score (4.6★).
  • Both Agno and Promptfoo use a Freemium model.
  • Both Agno and Promptfoo are open source.
  • Agno runs on Library, Cloud, Agent UI; Promptfoo runs on CLI, Library, Cloud.

Agno and Promptfoo at a glance

Agno

Agno Inc.

An agent SDK and FastAPI runtime with a separate control plane for operating agents, teams and workflows.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Consider Agno when you can operate its runtime; price the management plane separately from models and infrastructure.

Strengths

  • Documented separation of SDK, runtime and control plane
  • Published runtime code license
  • Configurable state and service interfaces

Key features

  • Agents, teams and workflows
  • REST and MCP serving
  • Configurable database state
  • Local or live control-plane connections

Best for

  • Serving a configured agent API
  • Operating team workflows with persisted state
Read the full Agno review →

Promptfoo

Promptfoo

Open-source CLI and library for configured LLM evaluations and red-team tests, with CI integration and separate commercial platform plans.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Consider Promptfoo when you can own the test cases and acceptance criteria; choose a commercial tier for the controls you actually require, and budget model use separately.

Strengths

  • Configuration-based evaluations and provider comparisons
  • Documented CI integration and failure thresholds
  • MIT-licensed CLI and library
  • Commercial cloud and on-premise options

Key features

  • Configuration-based evaluations
  • Red-team probes
  • CI threshold checks
  • Provider output comparisons
  • Free Community and quoted enterprise plans

Best for

  • Checking prompt changes against maintained regression cases
  • Comparing model outputs under the same configured assertions
  • Investigating security failures on authorized LLM applications
Read the full Promptfoo review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Agno also lists: Agents, teams and workflows, REST and MCP serving, Configurable database state, Local or live control-plane connections
  • Promptfoo also lists: Configuration-based evaluations, Red-team probes, CI threshold checks, Provider output comparisons, Free Community and quoted enterprise plans

Frequently asked questions

Is Agno or Promptfoo better?

Agno and Promptfoo carry the same editorial score (4.6★), so the better choice depends on your needs — see the feature and platform comparison above.

Which is cheaper, Agno or Promptfoo?

Both Agno and Promptfoo use a Freemium pricing model.

Are Agno and Promptfoo open source?

Yes — both Agno and Promptfoo are open source.

What platforms do Agno and Promptfoo support?

Agno supports Library, Cloud, Agent UI; Promptfoo supports CLI, Library, Cloud.

What are the main features of Agno and Promptfoo?

Agno: Agents, teams and workflows, REST and MCP serving, Configurable database state, Local or live control-plane connections. Promptfoo: Configuration-based evaluations, Red-team probes, CI threshold checks, Provider output comparisons, Free Community and quoted enterprise plans.

More Code Generation comparisons