Amp vs Cline
Amp and Cline are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Amp | Cline |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Cline Bot |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.7 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | IDE, CLI, Web | VS Code |
| Key features | Graph-aware coding agent, Edits, tests and PRs, Sourcegraph code intelligence | Autonomous multi-file edits, Terminal command execution, BYOK multi-model support |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Cline has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★).
- Amp is Paid, while Cline is Freemium.
- Cline is open source (its code is public), while Amp is proprietary.
- Amp runs on IDE, CLI, Web; Cline runs on VS Code.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amp or Cline better?
By user rating, Cline scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Amp or Cline?
Amp is Paid and Cline is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Amp and Cline open source?
Cline is open source, while Amp is proprietary.