Amp vs Continue
Amp and Continue are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Amp | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Continue |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | IDE, CLI, Web | Desktop |
| Key features | Graph-aware coding agent, Edits, tests and PRs, Sourcegraph code intelligence | Bring-your-own-model, VS Code and JetBrains support, Local model support |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Open source |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Amp has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★).
- Amp is Paid, while Continue is Freemium.
- Amp runs on IDE, CLI, Web; Continue runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amp or Continue better?
By user rating, Amp scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Amp or Continue?
Amp is Paid and Continue is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Amp and Continue open source?
No — neither Amp nor Continue is open source.