Amp vs Cursor
Amp and Cursor are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Cursor |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.8 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | IDE, CLI, Web | Desktop |
| Key features | Graph-aware coding agent, Edits, tests and PRs, Sourcegraph code intelligence | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★).
- Amp is Paid, while Cursor is Freemium.
- Amp runs on IDE, CLI, Web; Cursor runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amp or Cursor better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Amp or Cursor?
Amp is Paid and Cursor is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Amp and Cursor open source?
No — neither Amp nor Cursor is open source.