Augment Code vs Cursor
Augment Code and Cursor are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Augment | Cursor |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.8 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | IDE, CLI, API | Desktop |
| Key features | Codebase-wide context engine, Agents tuned for large repos, Slack & issue-tracker awareness | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.4★).
- Augment Code is Paid, while Cursor is Freemium.
- Augment Code runs on IDE, CLI, API; Cursor runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Augment Code or Cursor better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Cursor?
Augment Code is Paid and Cursor is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Augment Code and Cursor open source?
No — neither Augment Code nor Cursor is open source.