Augment Code vs Cursor Background Agents
Augment Code and Cursor Background Agents are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Augment Code | Cursor Background Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Augment | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | IDE, CLI, API | Web, IDE |
| Key features | Codebase-wide context engine, Agents tuned for large repos, Slack & issue-tracker awareness | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor Background Agents has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Both Augment Code and Cursor Background Agents use a Paid model.
- Augment Code runs on IDE, CLI, API; Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE.
Frequently asked questions
Is Augment Code or Cursor Background Agents better?
By user rating, Cursor Background Agents scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Cursor Background Agents?
Both Augment Code and Cursor Background Agents use a Paid pricing model.
Are Augment Code and Cursor Background Agents open source?
No — neither Augment Code nor Cursor Background Agents is open source.