Bolt vs Cursor 2.0
Bolt and Cursor 2.0 are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Bolt | Cursor 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | StackBlitz | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Web | Desktop |
| Key features | In-browser full-stack dev, Instant preview, One-click deploy | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Bolt is Freemium, while Cursor 2.0 is Paid.
- Bolt runs on Web; Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bolt or Cursor 2.0 better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Bolt or Cursor 2.0?
Bolt is Freemium and Cursor 2.0 is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Bolt and Cursor 2.0 open source?
No — neither Bolt nor Cursor 2.0 is open source.