Cline vs Cursor 2.0
Cline and Cursor 2.0 are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cline | Cursor 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cline Bot | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | VS Code | Desktop |
| Key features | Autonomous multi-file edits, Terminal command execution, BYOK multi-model support | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Key differences
- Cline has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★).
- Cline is Freemium, while Cursor 2.0 is Paid.
- Cline is open source (its code is public), while Cursor 2.0 is proprietary.
- Cline runs on VS Code; Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cline or Cursor 2.0 better?
By user rating, Cline scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cline or Cursor 2.0?
Cline is Freemium and Cursor 2.0 is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cline and Cursor 2.0 open source?
Cline is open source, while Cursor 2.0 is proprietary.