CodeGeeX vs Cursor 2.0
CodeGeeX and Cursor 2.0 are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | CodeGeeX | Cursor 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Zhipu AI | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web | Desktop |
| Key features | Open multilingual model, IDE plugins, Code translation between languages | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode |
| Headquarters | Beijing, China | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4★).
- CodeGeeX is Freemium, while Cursor 2.0 is Paid.
- CodeGeeX runs on Desktop, Web; Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is CodeGeeX or Cursor 2.0 better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, CodeGeeX or Cursor 2.0?
CodeGeeX is Freemium and Cursor 2.0 is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are CodeGeeX and Cursor 2.0 open source?
No — neither CodeGeeX nor Cursor 2.0 is open source.