Codex vs Continue
Codex and Continue are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Codex | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | OpenAI | Continue |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | CLI, IDE, Cloud, Web | Desktop |
| Key features | Cloud sandbox task execution, Codex CLI (open source), IDE extension | Bring-your-own-model, VS Code and JetBrains support, Local model support |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Open source |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Codex has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★).
- Codex is Paid, while Continue is Freemium.
- Codex runs on CLI, IDE, Cloud, Web; Continue runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Codex or Continue better?
By user rating, Codex scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Codex or Continue?
Codex is Paid and Continue is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Codex and Continue open source?
No — neither Codex nor Continue is open source.