Continue vs Cursor 2.0
Continue and Cursor 2.0 are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Continue | Cursor 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Continue | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | Desktop |
| Key features | Bring-your-own-model, VS Code and JetBrains support, Local model support | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode |
| Headquarters | Open source | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Continue is Freemium, while Cursor 2.0 is Paid.
- Continue runs on Desktop; Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Cursor 2.0 better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Continue or Cursor 2.0?
Continue is Freemium and Cursor 2.0 is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Continue and Cursor 2.0 open source?
No — neither Continue nor Cursor 2.0 is open source.