Continue vs Supermaven
Continue and Supermaven are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Continue | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Continue | Supermaven |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop | Desktop |
| Key features | Bring-your-own-model, VS Code and JetBrains support, Local model support | Ultra-low latency completions, Repository-wide context, IDE plugins |
| Headquarters | Open source | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Continue has a higher user rating (4.4★ vs 4.3★).
- Both Continue and Supermaven use a Freemium model.
- Continue runs on Desktop; Supermaven runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Supermaven better?
By user rating, Continue scores higher (4.4★ vs 4.3★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Continue or Supermaven?
Both Continue and Supermaven use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Continue and Supermaven open source?
No — neither Continue nor Supermaven is open source.