Cursor 2.0 vs Devin
Cursor 2.0 and Devin are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Cognition |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay-as-you-go |
| Platforms | Desktop | Web, API |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | Autonomous coding agent, End-to-end task execution, Slack & GitHub integration |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★).
- Cursor 2.0 is Paid, while Devin is Pay-as-you-go.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; Devin runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or Devin better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.3★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or Devin?
Cursor 2.0 is Paid and Devin is Pay-as-you-go. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor 2.0 and Devin open source?
No — neither Cursor 2.0 nor Devin is open source.