Cursor 2.0 vs JetBrains AI Assistant
Cursor 2.0 and JetBrains AI Assistant are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | JetBrains AI Assistant |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | JetBrains |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.1 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | Desktop |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | IDE-native integration, Project-aware chat, Inline refactoring |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.1★).
- Both Cursor 2.0 and JetBrains AI Assistant use a Paid model.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; JetBrains AI Assistant runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or JetBrains AI Assistant better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.1★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or JetBrains AI Assistant?
Both Cursor 2.0 and JetBrains AI Assistant use a Paid pricing model.
Are Cursor 2.0 and JetBrains AI Assistant open source?
No — neither Cursor 2.0 nor JetBrains AI Assistant is open source.