Cursor 2.0 vs Windsurf
Cursor 2.0 and Windsurf are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Cognition |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop | Desktop |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | Cascade AI agent, AI code completion, Code chat |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★).
- Cursor 2.0 is Paid, while Windsurf is Freemium.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; Windsurf runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or Windsurf better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or Windsurf?
Cursor 2.0 is Paid and Windsurf is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor 2.0 and Windsurf open source?
No — neither Cursor 2.0 nor Windsurf is open source.