Cursor 2.0 vs Windsurf Editor
Cursor 2.0 and Windsurf Editor are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | Windsurf Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Windsurf |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop | Desktop |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | Cascade agentic AI, Multi-file coordinated edits, Codebase understanding |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Mountain View, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Cursor 2.0 is Paid, while Windsurf Editor is Freemium.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; Windsurf Editor runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or Windsurf Editor better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or Windsurf Editor?
Cursor 2.0 is Paid and Windsurf Editor is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor 2.0 and Windsurf Editor open source?
No — neither Cursor 2.0 nor Windsurf Editor is open source.