Cursor Background Agents vs Devin
Cursor Background Agents and Devin are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor Background Agents | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Cognition |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay-as-you-go |
| Platforms | Web, IDE | Web, API |
| Key features | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have | Autonomous coding agent, End-to-end task execution, Slack & GitHub integration |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor Background Agents has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★).
- Cursor Background Agents is Paid, while Devin is Pay-as-you-go.
- Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE; Devin runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor Background Agents or Devin better?
By user rating, Cursor Background Agents scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.3★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor Background Agents or Devin?
Cursor Background Agents is Paid and Devin is Pay-as-you-go. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor Background Agents and Devin open source?
No — neither Cursor Background Agents nor Devin is open source.