Cursor Background Agents vs Factory
Cursor Background Agents and Factory are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor Background Agents | Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Factory |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | Web, IDE | Web, API |
| Key features | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have | Specialized coding droids, PR-native workflow, Org and repo context |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor Background Agents has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Both Cursor Background Agents and Factory use a Paid model.
- Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE; Factory runs on Web, API.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor Background Agents or Factory better?
By user rating, Cursor Background Agents scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor Background Agents or Factory?
Both Cursor Background Agents and Factory use a Paid pricing model.
Are Cursor Background Agents and Factory open source?
No — neither Cursor Background Agents nor Factory is open source.