Cursor vs Trae
Cursor and Trae are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor | Trae |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cursor | ByteDance |
| Rating | ★ 4.8 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop | Windows, macOS |
| Key features | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion | VS Code-compatible editor, Agentic multi-file coding, Builder mode from prompt to app |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, USA / Beijing, China |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★).
- Both Cursor and Trae use a Freemium model.
- Cursor runs on Desktop; Trae runs on Windows, macOS.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor or Trae better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.3★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor or Trae?
Both Cursor and Trae use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Cursor and Trae open source?
No — neither Cursor nor Trae is open source.