Kling 1.6 vs Wan
Kling 1.6 and Wan are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Kling 1.6 | Wan |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Kuaishou | Alibaba |
| Rating | ★ 4.3 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Platforms | Web | Self-hosted, API, Web |
| Key features | Improved motion coherence, Multi-image reference, Lip-sync | Open weights (5B & 14B tiers), Text-to-video & image-to-video, First/last frame control |
| Headquarters | Beijing, China | Hangzhou, China |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Wan has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★).
- Kling 1.6 is Freemium, while Wan is Free.
- Wan is open source (its code is public), while Kling 1.6 is proprietary.
- Kling 1.6 runs on Web; Wan runs on Self-hosted, API, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Kling 1.6 or Wan better?
By user rating, Wan scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.3★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Kling 1.6 or Wan?
Kling 1.6 is Freemium and Wan is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Kling 1.6 and Wan open source?
Wan is open source, while Kling 1.6 is proprietary.