Litmaps vs Microsoft Loop
Litmaps and Microsoft Loop are both Productivity tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Litmaps | Microsoft Loop |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Litmaps | Microsoft |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Teams, Outlook |
| Key features | Growing citation maps from seed papers, Discovery of unconnected-but-relevant works, Shared maps for labs | Loop components in Teams and Outlook, Copilot in the page, 365 identity |
| Headquarters | Wellington, New Zealand | Redmond, USA |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Litmaps has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.2★).
- Both Litmaps and Microsoft Loop use a Freemium model.
- Litmaps runs on Web; Microsoft Loop runs on Web, Teams, Outlook.
Frequently asked questions
Is Litmaps or Microsoft Loop better?
By user rating, Litmaps scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.2★). Both are capable Productivity tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Litmaps or Microsoft Loop?
Both Litmaps and Microsoft Loop use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Litmaps and Microsoft Loop open source?
No — neither Litmaps nor Microsoft Loop is open source.