MiniMax Video vs Wan
MiniMax Video and Wan are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | MiniMax Video | Wan |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | MiniMax | Alibaba |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Platforms | Web, API | Self-hosted, API, Web |
| Key features | Text-to-video from MiniMax, API access beside the Hailuo product, Cinematic camera language | Open weights (5B & 14B tiers), Text-to-video & image-to-video, First/last frame control |
| Headquarters | Shanghai, China | Hangzhou, China |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Wan has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★).
- MiniMax Video is Freemium, while Wan is Free.
- Wan is open source (its code is public), while MiniMax Video is proprietary.
- MiniMax Video runs on Web, API; Wan runs on Self-hosted, API, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax Video or Wan better?
By user rating, Wan scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax Video or Wan?
MiniMax Video is Freemium and Wan is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are MiniMax Video and Wan open source?
Wan is open source, while MiniMax Video is proprietary.