Veo 3 vs Wan
Veo 3 and Wan are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Veo 3 | Wan |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Alibaba | |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Platforms | Web, API | Self-hosted, API, Web |
| Key features | Native synchronized audio (dialogue, SFX, music), Strong physics & prompt adherence, Image-to-video with control | Open weights (5B & 14B tiers), Text-to-video & image-to-video, First/last frame control |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, USA | Hangzhou, China |
| Founded | 2025 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Veo 3 has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★).
- Veo 3 is Paid, while Wan is Free.
- Wan is open source (its code is public), while Veo 3 is proprietary.
- Veo 3 runs on Web, API; Wan runs on Self-hosted, API, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Veo 3 or Wan better?
By user rating, Veo 3 scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Veo 3 or Wan?
Veo 3 is Paid and Wan is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Veo 3 and Wan open source?
Wan is open source, while Veo 3 is proprietary.