Skip to index

Veo vs Wan

Veo and Wan are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeVeoWan
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
Rating★ 4.6★ 4.5
PricingPay-as-you-goPay-as-you-go
PlatformsWeb, APISelf-hosted, API, Web
Key featuresModel-dependent video and native audio generation, Image and frame guidance, Selected models support video extensionPublic Wan2.2 code and weights, Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video, Model-specific GPU requirements
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceNoYes

Key differences

  • Veo carries the higher editorial score (4.6★ vs 4.5★).
  • Both Veo and Wan use a Pay-as-you-go model.
  • Wan is open source (its code is public), while Veo is proprietary.
  • Veo runs on Web, API; Wan runs on Self-hosted, API, Web.

Veo and Wan at a glance

Veo

Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind's video model family, available through selected Google apps and APIs; model versions and access routes have different features and billing.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go

Editorial verdict

Match the exact version, access route and rights requirements first. Budget API generation separately and review output before publication.

Strengths

  • Published model-specific controls and metering
  • Audio and visual generation in supported versions

Key features

  • Model-dependent video and native audio generation
  • Image and frame guidance
  • Selected models support video extension
  • API usage billed separately from consumer plans

Best for

  • Storyboard or visual drafts using authorized references
  • Evaluate a specific frame-control or extension workflow
Read the full Veo review →

Wan

Alibaba

Alibaba's video model family: public Wan2.2 code/weights for self-hosting and separately billed cloud models. Capabilities, hardware, licenses and fees must be checked per release and service.

Rating
4.5★
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go

Editorial verdict

Select a specific Wan checkpoint or cloud model first, then budget hardware or usage fees and validate its outputs; the family name alone does not establish quality, licensing or cost.

Strengths

  • Public Wan2.2 code and checkpoints enable self-hosting
  • Model-specific local inference instructions
  • Separate cloud API option with documented usage billing

Key features

  • Public Wan2.2 code and weights
  • Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video
  • Model-specific GPU requirements
  • Separately billed cloud API

Best for

  • Evaluating a versioned local video-generation pipeline
  • Comparing self-hosted and cloud deployment budgets
  • Research with a specifically licensed Wan2.2 checkpoint
Read the full Wan review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Veo also lists: Model-dependent video and native audio generation, Image and frame guidance, Selected models support video extension, API usage billed separately from consumer plans
  • Wan also lists: Public Wan2.2 code and weights, Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video, Model-specific GPU requirements, Separately billed cloud API

Frequently asked questions

Is Veo or Wan better?

By editorial score, Veo scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Veo or Wan?

Both Veo and Wan use a Pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Are Veo and Wan open source?

Wan is open source, while Veo is proprietary.

What platforms do Veo and Wan support?

Veo supports Web, API; Wan supports Self-hosted, API, Web.

What are the main features of Veo and Wan?

Veo: Model-dependent video and native audio generation, Image and frame guidance, Selected models support video extension, API usage billed separately from consumer plans. Wan: Public Wan2.2 code and weights, Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video, Model-specific GPU requirements, Separately billed cloud API.

More Video Generation comparisons