Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor 2.0
Amazon Q Developer and Cursor 2.0 are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Amazon Q Developer | Cursor 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | AWS | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop, CLI, Web | Desktop |
| Key features | Inline code suggestions, Security vulnerability scanning, AWS service guidance | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode |
| Headquarters | Seattle, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4★).
- Amazon Q Developer is Freemium, while Cursor 2.0 is Paid.
- Amazon Q Developer runs on Desktop, CLI, Web; Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Q Developer or Cursor 2.0 better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Q Developer or Cursor 2.0?
Amazon Q Developer is Freemium and Cursor 2.0 is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Amazon Q Developer and Cursor 2.0 open source?
No — neither Amazon Q Developer nor Cursor 2.0 is open source.