Amp vs Cody
Amp and Cody are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Amp | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Sourcegraph |
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | IDE, CLI, Web | Desktop, Web |
| Key features | Graph-aware coding agent, Edits, tests and PRs, Sourcegraph code intelligence | Codebase-wide context, Multi-repository search, Inline edits and chat |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Mateo, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Amp has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.2★).
- Amp is Paid, while Cody is Freemium.
- Amp runs on IDE, CLI, Web; Cody runs on Desktop, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amp or Cody better?
By user rating, Amp scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.2★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Amp or Cody?
Amp is Paid and Cody is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Amp and Cody open source?
No — neither Amp nor Cody is open source.