Cline vs Cody
Cline and Cody are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cline | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cline Bot | Sourcegraph |
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | VS Code | Desktop, Web |
| Key features | Autonomous multi-file edits, Terminal command execution, BYOK multi-model support | Codebase-wide context, Multi-repository search, Inline edits and chat |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Mateo, USA |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Key differences
- Cline has a higher user rating (4.7★ vs 4.2★).
- Both Cline and Cody use a Freemium model.
- Cline is open source (its code is public), while Cody is proprietary.
- Cline runs on VS Code; Cody runs on Desktop, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cline or Cody better?
By user rating, Cline scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.2★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cline or Cody?
Both Cline and Cody use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Cline and Cody open source?
Cline is open source, while Cody is proprietary.