Cody vs Cursor Background Agents
Cody and Cursor Background Agents are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cody | Cursor Background Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.2 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web | Web, IDE |
| Key features | Codebase-wide context, Multi-repository search, Inline edits and chat | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor Background Agents has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.2★).
- Cody is Freemium, while Cursor Background Agents is Paid.
- Cody runs on Desktop, Web; Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cody or Cursor Background Agents better?
By user rating, Cursor Background Agents scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.2★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cody or Cursor Background Agents?
Cody is Freemium and Cursor Background Agents is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cody and Cursor Background Agents open source?
No — neither Cody nor Cursor Background Agents is open source.