Cody vs Trae
Cody and Trae are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cody | Trae |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | ByteDance |
| Rating | ★ 4.2 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web | Windows, macOS |
| Key features | Codebase-wide context, Multi-repository search, Inline edits and chat | VS Code-compatible editor, Agentic multi-file coding, Builder mode from prompt to app |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, USA | San Francisco, USA / Beijing, China |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Trae has a higher user rating (4.3★ vs 4.2★).
- Both Cody and Trae use a Freemium model.
- Cody runs on Desktop, Web; Trae runs on Windows, macOS.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cody or Trae better?
By user rating, Trae scores higher (4.3★ vs 4.2★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cody or Trae?
Both Cody and Trae use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Cody and Trae open source?
No — neither Cody nor Trae is open source.