Continue vs Cursor Background Agents
Continue and Cursor Background Agents are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Continue | Cursor Background Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Continue | Anysphere |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Desktop | Web, IDE |
| Key features | Bring-your-own-model, VS Code and JetBrains support, Local model support | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have |
| Headquarters | Open source | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor Background Agents has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Continue is Freemium, while Cursor Background Agents is Paid.
- Continue runs on Desktop; Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE.
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Cursor Background Agents better?
By user rating, Cursor Background Agents scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Continue or Cursor Background Agents?
Continue is Freemium and Cursor Background Agents is Paid. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Continue and Cursor Background Agents open source?
No — neither Continue nor Cursor Background Agents is open source.