Cursor 2.0 vs OpenHands
Cursor 2.0 and OpenHands are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | All Hands AI |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Platforms | Desktop | Self-hosted, CLI, Web |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | Autonomous code editing & testing, Sandboxed runtime environment, Browser interaction |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Remote (open source) |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Cursor 2.0 is Paid, while OpenHands is Free.
- OpenHands is open source (its code is public), while Cursor 2.0 is proprietary.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; OpenHands runs on Self-hosted, CLI, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or OpenHands better?
By user rating, Cursor 2.0 scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or OpenHands?
Cursor 2.0 is Paid and OpenHands is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor 2.0 and OpenHands open source?
OpenHands is open source, while Cursor 2.0 is proprietary.