Cursor Background Agents vs OpenHands
Cursor Background Agents and OpenHands are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor Background Agents | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | All Hands AI |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.4 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Platforms | Web, IDE | Self-hosted, CLI, Web |
| Key features | Background agents that open PRs, Assign from Cursor or the web, Keeps the repo context you already have | Autonomous code editing & testing, Sandboxed runtime environment, Browser interaction |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Remote (open source) |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Cursor Background Agents has a higher user rating (4.6★ vs 4.4★).
- Cursor Background Agents is Paid, while OpenHands is Free.
- OpenHands is open source (its code is public), while Cursor Background Agents is proprietary.
- Cursor Background Agents runs on Web, IDE; OpenHands runs on Self-hosted, CLI, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor Background Agents or OpenHands better?
By user rating, Cursor Background Agents scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cursor Background Agents or OpenHands?
Cursor Background Agents is Paid and OpenHands is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor Background Agents and OpenHands open source?
OpenHands is open source, while Cursor Background Agents is proprietary.