Skip to index

Cursor Bugbot vs Devin

Cursor Bugbot and Devin are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeCursor BugbotDevin
VendorAnysphereCognition
Rating★ 4.5★ 4.3
PricingPaidPay-as-you-go
PlatformsGitHub, WebWeb, API
Key featuresPR comments with reproductions, Runs code, not only reads diffs, GitHub-native reviewAutonomous coding agent, End-to-end task execution, Slack & GitHub integration
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USASan Francisco, USA
Founded20252024
Open sourceNoNo

Key differences

  • Cursor Bugbot has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★).
  • Cursor Bugbot is Paid, while Devin is Pay-as-you-go.
  • Cursor Bugbot runs on GitHub, Web; Devin runs on Web, API.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cursor Bugbot or Devin better?

By user rating, Cursor Bugbot scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.3★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Cursor Bugbot or Devin?

Cursor Bugbot is Paid and Devin is Pay-as-you-go. Check each product page for current plan details.

Are Cursor Bugbot and Devin open source?

No — neither Cursor Bugbot nor Devin is open source.

More Code Generation comparisons